NCCN's value pathways: the drive for quality cancer care.

نویسنده

  • Patricia J Goldsmith
چکیده

The quality of patient care often varies based on numerous factors, including health care setting, geographic location, access to medications, insurance coverage, and treatment protocols. Variations in health care are well established, and often lead to different services having varied outcomes depending on location.1–3 Recently, the issue of whether the use of clinical pathways—evidence-based treatment protocols designed to assist with the management of patient care—can decrease costs without reducing quality has been the subject of much discussion. The ability of pathways to reduce inappropriate variability in care is also at issue. Increasingly, payers are considering pathways in oncology when contracting with providers as a mechanism to improve quality, reduce variability, and decrease costs. This raises questions regarding what data are used to determine treatment options included in a pathway, the consistency with which they are monitored, how they affect reimbursement and insurance, and ultimately how they affect patient outcomes. As clinical treatment guidelines and pathways are increasingly deployed in oncology practice, they have a growing impact on the quality of treatment and how it is delivered. NCCN, The US Oncology Network, and McKesson Specialty Health are collaborating to develop enhanced oncology pathways delivered through innovative technology, which will strengthen standards in evidence-based, high-quality cancer care and enable new forms of transparent provider and payer relationships. Called “Value Pathways powered by NCCN,” they are the next step in a collaboration to deliver a first-of-its-kind clinical quality and regimen support system, building on a solution initially developed by Proventys, Inc. as CDS Oncology. This workflow-integrated software will allow physicians to assess treatment options consistent with evidence-based standards at the point of care. Value Pathways powered by NCCN, delivered through the clinical quality and regimen support system, is an important step forward in ensuring that patients receive the highest quality treatment while offering options to address the costs of cancer care. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines)— the most comprehensive and most frequently updated clinical practice guidelines available in any area of medicine—will serve as the foundational evidence source within the clinical quality and regimen support system and will be supplemented by the collaboratively developed Value Pathways. Anchored in clinical quality and evidence-based medicine, Value Pathways powered by NCCN will build on The US Oncology Network’s Level I Pathways (discussed in more detail on page 121) and help patients receive the highest-quality care with the best opportunity for positive outcomes, while also recognizing the importance of value in determining appropriate treatment. These pathways will provide payers and employers with a quality-based program, developed by trusted oncologist-led sources through a transparent process, suitable to drive value-based reimbursement plans. To develop the pathways, leading physicians of The US Oncology Network, supported by McKesson Specialty Health, will work with NCCN Guidelines Panel oncologists from NCCN Member Institutions. Initially, the new pathways will cover 19 tumor types, and will later be expanded to match the breadth of the NCCN Guidelines. Value Pathways powered by NCCN will reflect the collaborative effort of nearly 2000 physicians and oncology researchers affiliated with NCCN Guidelines Panels and The US Oncology Network. Ongoing development of Value Pathways Patricia J. Goldsmith

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Understanding Contextual Factors in Cost, Quality and Priority Setting Decisions in Health; Comment on “Contextual Factors Influencing Cost and Quality Decisions in Health and Care: A Structured Evidence Review and Narrative Synthesis”

There is growing recognition in the academic literature that critical decisions concerning resource allocation and resource management in health and care are influenced by a range of contextual factors. In their paper in this journal, Williams et al define these ‘decisions of value’ as being characterized by a significant and demonstrable impact on quality and resources in health and care. ‘Dec...

متن کامل

The effect of palliative care on the quality of life of cancer patients: A systematic review

Back grand & Aim: Recently, palliative care has become more important in relation to the quality of life of cancer patients, and there are studies that determine the optimal quality of life for the patient and his family. The aim of this study is to systematically review the Effect of palliative care on the quality of life of cancer patients. Methods:In this systematic review, we used keywords ...

متن کامل

درک پرستاران از مراقبت‌های پایان حیات در بیماران مبتلا به سرطان: یک مطالعه کیفی

Background & Aims: Cancer is an important cause of mortality worldwide. Many cancer patients are hospitalized at the end of their life, requiring end-of-life care. The perception of nurses toward end-of-life care could correct inappropriate care behaviors and enhance the quality of care. The present study aimed to assess the understanding of nurses regarding the end-of-life care of cancer patie...

متن کامل

Cancer-related fatigue: role of oncology nurses in translating National Comprehensive Cancer Network assessment guidelines into practice.

This article reviews the National Comprehensive Cancer Network's (NCCN's) guidelines for cancer-related fatigue (CRF) assessment and discusses many of the common barriers that hinder the translation of the CRF guidelines into practice settings. Current assessment and measurement scales validated in patients with cancer are highlighted, and case studies reflect the vital roles that oncology nurs...

متن کامل

مراقبت ارزش محور و ضرورت ارزیابی اقتصادی خدمات پرستاری

Economic evaluation is an invaluable and important tool in healthcare decision- and policy-making. The volume-based paradigm has been a prominent tool to evaluate healthcare economy for consecutive decades. In this approach, the main focus is on volume of treated patients alongside to reduce healthcare costs. Despite this view and during recent years, there was a dramatic rising in healthcare c...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN

دوره 11 2  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2013